OCR Restructuring To Strengthen Rights of Conscience and Religious Freedom Rights Oversight and Enforcement

May 20, 2026

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) May 18, 2026 announcement of its reorganization of its Office for Civil Rights (OCR) signals employer and other health plan sponsors, health care providers and others funded or regulated by HHS experiencing discrimination or other conflicts with conscience or religious objections may expect greater protection from HHS, even as it warns federal health care exchange, Medicare and Medicaid Advantage health plans, and other health payers; health care providers; housing and education providers, states and other organizations and individuals receiving HHS funding to ensure their practices and policies comply with current HHS policies on federal conscience and religious freedom rights.

The reorganization of the HHS agency charged with enforcing HHS-administered laws protecting civil rights, conscience and religious freedom, and health information privacy and security, returns OCR to a program-based structure that reelevates conscience and religious freedom protection enforcement by realigning OCR into three distinct subject-matter divisions:

  • The Conscience and Religious Freedom Division,responsible for enfocing federal rights of conscience and religious freedom;
  • The Civil Rights Division, responsible for enforcing Section 1557 and other civil rights and disability laws implemented and enforced by HSS; and
  • The Health Information Privacy, Data, and Cybersecurity Division, responsible for implementing and enforcing the privacy, data security, data breach and privacy rights of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) and other privacy and data security requirements implemented and enforced by HHS.

Historical Background Leading To Reorganization

HHS originally established a separate OCR Conscience and Religious Freedom Division (CRFD) to handle federal enforcement of the nation’s laws that protect the rights of conscience and religious freedom protected under the United States Constitution and other federal laws in January 2018 during President Trump’s first presidency. That division enforced and raised public awareness of conscience and religious freedom laws in health and human services, underscoring that violations are serious infractions that transgress basic human dignity and fundamental rights.

CRFD operated until March of 2023, when the Biden administration dissolved the division in 2023. Although OCR maintained jurisdiction over conscience and religious freedom authorities in health and human services after 2023, the Biden Administration combined the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division and the then-Civil Rights Division into the Policy Division.

According to the announcement, the intake and processing of complaints filed with OCR, and the review of reported breaches involving unsecured protected health information, will continue to be handled by an Enforcement Division that supports centralized intake and field-office execution. The reorganization is not expected to result in a reduction of OCR’s workforce.The OCR reorganization announcement reports OCR will publish more information about the reorganization in a Federal Register notice next month. Scribe and stay tuned for more developments.

Reorganization Part of HHS Actions To Enhance Conscience Rights and Religious Freedom Protections

OCR intends for the reorganization to strengthen its enhanced efforts to protect federal rights of conscience and religious freedom undertaken in response to Trump Administration directives. OCR’s announcement responds builds upon the Trump Administration policy and HHS’ resulting recent efforts to enforce federally protected right of conscience protections and protect human life. 

Since President Trump began his second administration, he has made protection of rights of conscience, freedom of religion and protection of human life policy priorities. See  Fact Sheet: HHS Takes Comprehensive Action to Enforce Conscience Rights and Protect Human Life, and OCR’s conscience and religious freedom webpage. Since returning to office in January 2025, President Trump has issued several executive orders and presidential directives designed to expand protections for religious liberty, conscience rights, and faith-based participation in federal programs since beginning his second term in office by among other things:

  • Establishing the White House Faith Office within the Executive Office of the President and ordering all executive agencies to protect religious liberty, coordinate with faith-based organizations, and identify barriers affecting religious groups seeking participation in federal programs under Executive Order 14205;
  • Creating a federal “Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias,” led by the Department of Justice and involving multiple agencies charged with reviewing federal policies, investigations, and enforcement activities allegedly discriminating against Christians or religious organizations. DOJ Task Force Report on Anti-Christian Bias and Religious Liberty;
  • Establishing the Religious Liberty Commission, declaring it federal policy to “vigorously enforce” protections for religious liberty under federal law, and directing the Commission to study threats to and recommend safeguards for religious exercise including conscience protections, free exercise rights, religious education, and the role of faith-based organizations in public life under Executive Order 14291; and
  • Proclaiming January 26. 2026, Religious Freedom Day, 2026.

OCR’s announced restructuring is part of a broader set of activities OCR is undertaking to strengthen its oversight and enforcement of conscience and religious freedom rights in response to these Trump Administration directives. Before announcing the restructuring, OCR already has taken enforcement action to protect health care workers, support whistleblowers, and reinforce adherence to religious and conscience exemptions in the Vaccines for Children Program as part of these policies. For example, OCR previously has:

  • Repudiated a 2021 Biden Administration era letter that excluded employers and plan sponsors from the scope of health care entities protected by the Weldon Amendment and notified states and other regulated entities no longer rely on the now-repudiated legal position;
  • Repudiated other Biden Administration era policies on reproductive rights, diversity equity and inclusion and other policies considered outdated or inconsistent with the Trump Administration’s interpretation of federal conscience and religious freedom rights;
  • Issued public notices describing OCR deregulatory actions to align with President Trump’s E.O. 14182, Enforcing the Hyde Amendment;
  • Issued a nationwide Dear Colleague Letter explaining OCR’s right of conscious policy under the Trump Administration;
  • Issued a Notice of Violation that found an Illinois state law violated the Weldon and the Coats-Snowe Amendments, which are among two dozen federal health care conscience protection statutes that HHS enforces. The Illinois Notice of Violation charges the Illinois law unlawfully ties health care provider conscience protections to referral requirements in the case of abortion;
  • OCR announced its investigation of 13 states for allegedly violating the Weldon Amendment federal health care conscience law by coercing health care entities, health insurers, and employers and their health plans to provide coverage of, or pay for, abortion contrary to conscience;
  • To educate the public, OCR also released a nationwide Dear Colleague Letter summarizing federal health care conscience protection statutes, including those laws specific to abortion, sterilization, and assisted suicide; and
  • Undertaken high profile investigations and enforcement actions against academic medicine and other health, education or other HHS funding recipients perceived to have discriminated or violated rights of conscience or religious freedoms of individuals of Christian or Jewish faith.

OCR’s announcement of the reorganization makes clear it intends for the reorganization to strengthen its ability to enforce these and other interpretations and policies for the protection and defense of rights of conscience and religious freedom in accordance with the Trump Administration directives. The announcement quotes HHS Office for Civil Rights Director Paula M. Stannard as saying, “This reorganization reinstitutes a structure that rightly prioritizes civil rights and conscience and religious freedom alongside health information privacy and security,” and that “All three areas are deserving of subject-matter expertise and distinct senior executive leadership for OCR to best serve the American people.” HHS’ announcement also states the reorganized structure will improve OCR’s effectiveness and efficiency to advance the protection of conscience rights, address race-based discrimination in a color-blind manner, eradicate antisemitism and anti-Christian bias, and restore biological truth.

Given the current emphasis of OCR and other federal agencies on protection and enforcement of federally protected rights of conscience and religious freedom under current Trump Administration policies, employers, health care providers, health insurers and plans, academic medicine and other education, housing and other entities funded or participating in HHS programs specifically should contact qualified legal counsel for assistance in evaluating and ensuring that their policies and procedures properly align with OCR right of conscience and religious freedom enforcement policies. Along with generally reviewing policies or practices that might raise right of conscience or religious discrimination or freedom concerns, these entities also should tread carefully and seek the assistance of legal counsel with identifying and responding to requests or other potential right of conscience, religious discrimination, or religious freedom concerns arising in their dealings with employees, service providers, customers and others.

Meanwhile employer and other plan sponsors and other organizations that feel that they are suffering discrimination or other violations of their rights of conscience or religious freedom may wish to evaluate their ability to secure accommodations or other relief under the religious freedom and right of conscience policies from HHS or other applicable federal agencies, the courts, or both.

For Help or More Information

The author of this update, Cynthia Marcotte Stamer has decades of experience advising and assisting health industry clients to design, audit, and defend their organizations and practices including conducting audits and investigations, designing and updating compliance and risk management programs, responding to government investigations, conducting transaction, governance, and other due diligence, and assisting with other legal and operational compliance and risk management and legislative and regulatory affairs. She is available to assist your organization in assessing the impact of these developments and navigating the compliance and strategic steps that follow. For more information about these or other health care, managed care and other health benefits, or other health industry laws or concerns, contact Ms. Stamer via e-mail or via telephone at (214) 452 -8297.

About the Author

Cynthia Marcotte Stamer is an American College of Employee Benefits Counsel and a Martindale-Hubble “AV-Preeminent” (Top 1%) attorney and advisor board certified in labor and employment law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization peer peer celebrated as “Top Rated Lawyer” and “LEGAL LEADER™ “Top Rated Lawyer” and “Best Lawyer” for her work in ERISA & Employee Benefits Law, Health Care Law, Labor and Employment Law, and Business and Commercial Law.

Nationally recognised for her decades of leading edge health and other employee benefits and insurance, compensation, human resources and other management work, public policy leadership and advocacy, coaching, teachings, and publications, Ms. Stamer is well known for her decades of pragmatic, leading edge work, scholarship and thought leadership on health benefit and other health and managed care, privacy and data security and other employee benefit, insurance, and health industry legal, public policy and operational concerns. 

Ms. Stamer’s work throughout her career has focused heavily on working with health care and managed care, health and other employee benefit plan, insurance and financial services and other public and private organizations and their technology, data, and other service providers and advisors domestically and internationally with legal and operational compliance and risk management, performance and workforce management, regulatory and public policy and other legal and operational concerns.  As a a key focus of this work, she has continuously and extensively worked with domestic and international health plans, their sponsors, fiduciaries, administrators, and insurers; managed care and insurance organizations; third party administrators and other health benefit service providers; hospitals, health care systems and other health care providers, accreditation, peer review and quality committees and organizations; billing, utilization management, management services organizations, group purchasing organizations; pharmaceutical, pharmacy, and prescription benefit management and organizations; consultants; investors; EMR, claims, payroll and other technology, billing and reimbursement and other services and product vendors; products and solutions consultants and developers; investors; managed care organizations, self-insured health and other employee benefit plans, their sponsors, fiduciaries, administrators and service providers, insurers and other payers, health industry advocacy and other service providers and groups and other health and managed care industry clients as well as federal and state legislative, regulatory, investigatory and enforcement bodies and agencies.

Her experience includes more than 35 years of leading edge work for employer and other plan sponsors, plans and their fiduciaries, insurers, third party administrators, health care clearinghouses and other health care, insurance and other data and technology providers, and others on health and other employee benefits design, administration, compliance, and policy including decades of work on fiduciary compliance and risk management; eligibility, coverage and other plan mandates; administrative simplification and transparency; PBM, pharmacy and pharmaceutical management and regulation; surprise billing and other non-par provider; direct provider, vendor and other credentialing, contracting and management; and other managed care and insurance; high deductible, minimum or level premium, captive and other non traditional funding; and agency and private audits, investigations and enforcement; and other insured and self-insured health benefit contracting, design, administration, regulation, fiduciary and other liability managment, and other design, compliance, risk management, defense, and operations solutions.

She also has extensive experience helping health care systems and organizations, group and individual health care providers, health plans and insurers, health IT, life sciences and other health industry clients prevent, investigate, manage and resolve  sexual assault, abuse, harassment and other organizational, provider and employee misconduct and other performance and behavior; manage Section 1557, Section 504, Civil Rights Act and other discrimination and accommodation, and other regulatory, contractual and other compliance; vendors and suppliers; contracting and other terms of participation, medical billing, reimbursement, claims administration and coordination, Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, Medicare/Medicaid Advantage, ERISA and other payers and other provider-payer relations, contracting, compliance and enforcement; Form 990 and other nonprofit and tax-exemption; fundraising, investors, joint venture, and other business partners; quality and other performance measurement, management, discipline and reporting; physician and other workforce recruiting, performance management, peer review and other investigations and discipline, wage and hour, payroll, gain-sharing and other pay-for performance and other compensation, training, outsourcing and other human resources and workforce matters; board, medical staff and other governance; strategic planning, process and quality improvement; meaningful use, EMR, HIPAA and other technology,  data security and breach and other health IT and data; STARK, ant kickback, insurance, and other fraud prevention, investigation, defense and enforcement; audits, investigations, and enforcement actions; trade secrets and other intellectual property; crisis preparedness and response; internal, government and third-party licensure, credentialing, accreditation, HCQIA and other peer review and quality reporting, audits, investigations, enforcement and defense; patient relations and care;  internal controls and regulatory compliance; payer-provider, provider-provider, vendor, patient, governmental and community relations; facilities, practice, products and other sales, mergers, acquisitions and other business and commercial transactions; government procurement and contracting; grants; tax-exemption and not-for-profit; privacy and data security; training; risk and change management; regulatory affairs and public policy; process, product and service improvement, development and innovation, and other legal and operational compliance and risk management, government and regulatory affairs and operations concerns. to establish, administer and defend workforce and staffing, quality, and other compliance, risk management and operational practices, policies and actions; comply with requirements; investigate and respond to Department of Insurance, Board of Medicine, Health, Nursing, Pharmacy, Chiropractic, trucking, alcohol and firearm, and other licensing agencies, Department of Aging & Disability, FDA, Drug Enforcement Agency, OCR Privacy and Civil Rights, Department of Labor, IRS, HHS, DOD, FTC, SEC, CDC and other public health, Department of Justice and state attorneys’ general and other federal and state agencies; JCHO and other accreditation and quality organizations; private litigation and other federal and state health care industry actions: regulatory and public policy advocacy; training and discipline; enforcement;  and other strategic and operational concerns.

Former lead advisor to the Government of Bolivia on its Social Security Privatization reform, miss Stamer also has extensive legislative and regulatory affairs experience on federal, state and international employee benefits, healthcare, workforce, education, insurance, data privacy and security, antitrust, and other regulations and reforms.

In addition, Ms. Stamer contributes her time and leadership to numerous policy, professional, civil and other organizations, Ms. Stamer currently or previously served as the Scribe leading annual agency meetings on HIPAA and other issues with the Department of Health and Human Services; leadership Council Representative, speaker, author and faculty lead for the American Bar Association (“ABA”) Joint Committee on Employee Benefits; the ABA International Section International Employment Law Committee and International Life Sciences Committee Chair; the ABA Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section Medicine and Law Committee Chair and Employee Benefits and Worker’s Compensation Committees Vice Chair; the ABA Health Law Section Managed Care & Insurance Interest Group Chair and Risk Management Interest Group Chair; the ABA RPTE Employee Benefits & Other Compensation Group Chair and Welfare Benefit, Fiduciary Responsibility, and Plan Terminations and Transactions Committees Chair; Vice President and Executive Director of the North Texas Health Care Compliance Professionals Association; a Southwest Benefits Association Board Member; a SHRM Consultants National and Region IV Board Chair; WEB National Board Member and Dallas Chapter President; National Kidney Foundation of North Texas Board Member and Compliance Chair; Richardson Development Center (now Warren Center) for Children Early Childhood Intervention Agency Board President; a North Texas United Way Long Range Planning Committee Member; and other leadership involvement in a broad range of other professional and civic organizations.

Author of hundreds of highly regarded works on health and other benefits, human resources, health care, insurance, data privacy and security and other related concerns, examples of these publications include “Transparent PBM Contracting,” “ACOs, Direct Contracting: Legal & Practical Challenges For Employers, Providers & TPAs,” “The Medicare Advantage Contracting Manual,” “Third Party Administrator (TPA) Contracting Principles and Strategies and a multitude of other publications and presentations. 

For more information about Ms. Stamer or her health industry and other experience and involvements, see www.cynthiastamer.com or contact Ms. Stamer via telephone at (214) 452-8297 or via e-mail here.

Comments Off on OCR Restructuring To Strengthen Rights of Conscience and Religious Freedom Rights Oversight and Enforcement | Civil Rights, Discrimination, health Care, Health Plans, HHS, HIPAA, Medicaid, Medicare Advantage, Medicare Part D, OCR, Public Policy, religious accommodation, Religous Discrimination, RIghts of Conscience and Religious Freedom, Section 1557 | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer

Prepare Defenses Against Rising Religious Discrimination Exposures

February 6, 2024

A newly announced religious discrimination settlement reminds employers of the advisability of reviewing and strengthening the defensibility of their grooming, dress code, scheduling and time off and other employment policies, practices and other procedures for applying, granting or denying religious exceptions, and other employment practices to defend against potential discrimination exposures in light of rising religious sensitivities, the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling in Groff v. DeJoy, 143 S. Ct. 2279 (2023) and emerging Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) guidance and enforcement.

Religious Discrimination & Accommodation Under Civil Rights Act

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on religion and requires employers to reasonably accommodate an employee’s religious observance or practice, unless an accommodation would impose an undue hardship. The Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination in any aspect of employment, including hiring, firing, pay, job assignments, promotions, layoff, training, fringe benefits, and any other term or condition of employment. It also prohibits:

  • Forcing an employee to participate (or not participate) in a religious activity as a condition of employment;
  • Subjecting an applicant or employee to offensive remarks about a person’s religious beliefs or practice or other harassment that creates a hostile or offensive work environment or results in an adverse employment decision or other job detriment or certain other types of harassment, whether by the victim’s supervisor, a supervisor in another area, a co-worker, or someone who is not an employee of the employer, such as a client or customer;
  • Workplace or job segregation based on religion including religious garb and grooming practices;
  • Failing to reasonably accommodate an employee’s religious beliefs or practices, unless doing so would cause a burden that is substantial in the overall context of the employer’s business taking into account all relevant factors, including the particular accommodation at issue and its practical impact in light of the nature, size, and operating cost of the employer; and
  • Retaliating against an employee or applicant based on good faith exercise of his right to be free from religious discrimination or cooperation in investigations or other protected activities.

The duty to provide religious accommodation applies not only to schedule changes or leave for religious observances, but also to such things as dress or grooming practices that an employee follows as part of the employee’s religious reasons such as wearing particular head coverings or other religious dress or hairstyles or facial hair. It also includes an employee’s observance of a religious prohibition against wearing certain garments such as pants or miniskirts. 

Under the Civil Rights Act, the obligation to provide religious accommodation generally applies unless the employer demonstrate that the accommodation of the employee’s religious beliefs or practices would cause undue hardship to the employer. The burden of proving an undue hardship rests on the employer, who must show that the accommodation burden is substantial in the overall context of an employer’s business, taking into account all relevant factors in the case at hand, including the particular accommodation at issue and its practical impact in light of the nature, size and operating cost of the employer. 

The Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Groff v. DeJoy confirms employers seeking to defend their denial of a request for religious accommodation must be prepared to prove granting the religious accommodation request would impose a significant burden on the employer, holding the defense of undue hardship requires proof a burden that is “substantial in the overall context of an employer’s business” “taking into account all relevant factors in the case at hand, including the particular accommodations at issue and their practical impact in light of the nature, size and operating cost of an employer.” Mere proof a a “de minimis cost” will not suffice. See also EEOC Notice Concerning the Undue Hardship Standard in Title VII Religious Accommodation Cases.

Blackwell Security Services Religious Discrimination Litigation Settlement

The settlement with Blackwell Security Services, Inc. (Blackwell) recently announced by the EEOC highlights the challenge employers should anticipate facing in defending a denial of an employee or applicant request for exception from a dress code, grooming or other employer policy for religious reasons. 

On January 31, 2024, the EEOC announced Blackwell will pay $70,000 and provide other relief to settle the EEOC’s religious discrimination lawsuit that charged Blackwell wrongfully refused to accommodate a Muslim employee’s religious practice of wearing a beard in observance of his religious beliefs.

According to the EEOC, shortly after Blackwell hired the employee, a Blackwell supervisor told the employee that company policy required all employees be clean-shaven. When the employee requested an exemption from the policy to accommodate his religious practice, Blackwell told him to shave his beard or face termination even though the EEOC determined accommodating his religious practice would impose no cost or operational burden on the business. To avoid losing his job, the employee complied and shaved his beard, causing him significant distress.

Under the consent decree resolving the EEOC lawsuit, Blackwell will pay $70,000 in compensation to the now-former employee. Blackwell will also provide training to relevant management employees on federal laws prohibiting religious discrimination and will report any additional complaints of religious discrimination to the EEOC for the decree’s duration.

Employee Religious Discrimination Risks Rising

The EEOC charge and lawsuit against Blackwell is one of a deluge of religious discrimination charges filed with the EEOC in recent years. In fact, EEOC enforcement data shows that religious discrimination charges received by the EEOC soared from 2,111 in 2021 to 13,814 in 2022 while over the same period settlements rose from 146 in 2021 to 730 in 2022.

Religion-Based Charges (Charges filed with EEOC) FY 2013 – FY 2022
 FY 2013FY 2014FY 2015FY 2016FY 2017FY 2018FY 2019FY 2020FY 2021FY 2022*
Receipts3,7213,5493,5023,8253,4362,8592,7252,4042,11113,814
Resolutions3,8653,5753,7363,8273,9973,6533,0012,5702,0807,453
Settlements331268275266233151171144146730
Reasonable Cause1681161391211192821231035960
Monetary Benefits (Millions)**$11.2$8.7$10.8$10.1$11.2%$9.2$9.9$6.1$9.5$12.8
The chart represents the total number of charges filed and resolved under Title VII alleging religion-based discrimination as compiled by the Office of Enterprise Data and Analytics from data compiled from the EEOC’s Integrated Mission System.  This does not include charges filed with state or local Fair Employment Practices Agencies.  *EEOC notes, “In FY 2022, there was a significant increase in vaccine-related charges filed on the basis of religion. As a result, FY 2022 data may vary compared to previous years.”  ** Does not include monetary benefits obtained through litigation. See https://www.eeoc.gov/data/religion-based-charges-charges-filed-eeoc-fy-1997-fy-2022.

A number of factors have fueled the sharp rise in religious accommodation and other religious discrimination risks. Along with the Supreme Court’s affirmation of the high burden of proof employer must meet to justify refusing to grant religious accommodations to employees in Groff v. DeJoy, a series of religious accommodation guidance issued by the EEOC during and following the COVID-19 pandemic health care emergency and demands for religious accommodation exemptions to COVID-19 mask and vaccination mandates heightened awareness and the volume of religious discrimination claims filed with the EEOC.  See, e.g., What You Should Know About COVID-19 and the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and Other EEO Laws. Unsurprisingly, charges from these COVID-19 related and other religious accommodation claims brought since the COVID-19 pandemic health care emergency has and continues to fuel litigation, settlements and judgements. See, e.g., Children’s Hospital Pays $45K To Resolve COVID Vaccine Religious Discrimination Suit.

The already heightened awareness fueled during the COVID-19 health care emergency has been further heightened by EEOC and other governmental guidance and outreach in response to rising potential religious and national origin discrimination concerns arising from the Israeli/Palestinian conflict and various other international events. See e.g., Resolution of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Condemning Violence, Harassment, and Bias Against Jewish Persons in the United States; What to Do If You Face Antisemitism at Work; Anti-Arab, Anti-Middle Eastern, Anti-Muslim, and Antisemitic Discrimination are Illegal; Religious Garb and Grooming in the Workplace: Rights and Responsibilities; Fact Sheet on Religious Garb and Grooming in the Workplace: Rights and Responsibilities‘ Employment Discrimination Based on Religion, Ethnicity, or Country of Origin; Q&A for Employees: Responsibilities Concerning the Employment of Individuals Who Are, or Are Perceived to Be, Muslim or Middle Eastern; Q&A for Employers: Responsibilities Concerning the Employment of Individuals Who Are, or Are Perceived to Be, Muslim or Middle Eastern.

With these and other events continuing to escalate sensitivities and awareness of federal laws against religious discrimination, health care and other organizations should act to strengthen their ability to recognize and respond defensibly to religious accommodation and other religious discrimination risks whether arising from patients and other customers, employees or others.

Act To Mitigate Religious Discrimination Risks

In the face of the prioritization that the Biden Administration generally and OCR specifically is placing on religious and national origin in connection with the current Israeli-Palestinian hostilities, all covered facilities should brace for heightened oversight and enforcement by OCR the EEOC and other federal agencies, as well as private litigants. These organizations also should guard against retaliation liability, which can result even where the discrimination claim fails.

As a starting point, health care and other organizations should begin by reviewing their existing complaint history, policies, practices, training, reporting and investigation practices within the scope of attorney-client privilege and revise these policies as needed to strengthen their defensibility.

In connection with this review, health care and other organizations should ensure that their policies, procedures and notices clearly prohibit religious discrimination as well as communicate procedures for persons that believe their religious beliefs merit accommodation or otherwise believe they are subject to religious harassment or other discrimination to communicate their request to a representative of the organization appropriately trained to receive, evaluate and respond to the accommodation request defensibly. Most organizations will want to arrange for qualified legal counsel to be readily available to assist the responsible party with these activities. 

Organizations should consider adopting carefully crafted and documented internal procedures for receiving, investigating and responding to religious accommodation request in a manner that promotes their organization’s ability to demonstrate each request is assessed in accordance with the law free from the inappropriate application of assumptions or stereotypes about what constitutes a religious belief or practice or what type of accommodation is appropriate. Organizations should train managers and supervisors to grant religious accommodation requests whenever possible and to refer any questions about the appropriateness or response to any religious accommodation request to the designated responsible party.

When faced with a request for a religious accommodation which the organization believes cannot be implemented without undue hardship, most organizations will want to seek the advice of legal counsel while exploring opportunities to allow the requested or an alternative accommodation on a temporary basis pending further exploration of the requested more permanent accommodation. Appropriate communication and documentation processes also are important. In addition, all organizations will want to ensure that their organization takes appropriate steps to prevent and defend against potential retaliation claims.

Due to the legal and political sensitivity of the practices and analysis involved, employers and others involved in the review of these policies and practices or their application when handling religious accommodation requests or other events raising the potential for religious, national origin, race or related concerns, employers also should consider involving experienced legal counsel about the circumstances, as well as to take advantage of the availability of attorney-client privilege and other evidentiary rules to help mitigate exposures and enhance the defensibility of their actions.

For More Information

We hope this update is helpful. For more information about these or other health or other legal, management or public policy developments, please contact the author Cynthia Marcotte Stamer via e-mail or via telephone at (214) 452 -8297. 

Solutions Law Press, Inc. invites you to receive future updates by registering on our Solutions Law Press, Inc. Website and participating and contributing to the discussions in our Solutions Law Press, Inc. LinkedIn SLP Health Care Risk Management & Operations Group, HR & Benefits Update Compliance Group, and/or Coalition for Responsible Health Care Policy.

If you or someone else you know would like to receive future updates about developments on these and other concerns, please be sure that we have your current contact information including your preferred e-mail by creating your profile here

About the Author

Recognized by her peers as a Martindale-Hubble “AV-Preeminent” (Top 1%) and “Top Rated Lawyer” with special recognition LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell® as “LEGAL LEADER™ Texas Top Rated Lawyer” in Health Care Law and Labor and Employment Law; as among the “Best Lawyers In Dallas” for her work in the fields of “Labor & Employment,” “Tax: ERISA & Employee Benefits,” “Health Care” and “Business and Commercial Law” by D Magazine, Cynthia Marcotte Stamer is a practicing attorney board certified in labor and employment law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and management consultant, author, public policy advocate and lecturer widely known for 35 plus years of health industry and other management work, public policy leadership and advocacy, coaching, teachings, and publications.

A Fellow in the American College of Employee Benefit Counsel, Co-Chair of the American Bar Association (“ABA”) International Section Life Sciences and Health Committee and Vice-Chair of its International Employment Law Committee, Chair of the ABA TIPS Section Medicine & Law Committee, Past Chair of the ABA Managed Care & Insurance Interest Group, Scribe for the ABA JCEB Annual Agency Meeting with HHS-OCR, past chair of the ABA RPTE Employee Benefits & Other Compensation Group and current co-Chair of its Welfare Benefit Committee, and Chair of the ABA Intellectual Property Section Law Practice Management Committee, Ms. Stamer is most widely recognized for her decades of pragmatic, leading-edge work, scholarship and thought leadership on employment, heath benefit and other healthcare and life science, managed care and insurance and other workforce and staffing, employee benefits, safety, contracting, quality assurance, compliance and risk management, and other legal, public policy and operational concerns in the healthcare and life sciences, employee benefits, managed care and insurance, technology and other related industries. She speaks and publishes extensively on these and other related compliance issues.

Ms. Stamer’s work throughout her career has focused heavily on working with health care and managed care, life sciences, health and other employee benefit plan, insurance and financial services, retail, manufacturing, hospitality, and other organizations of all types and their technology, data, and other service providers and advisors domestically and internationally with employment, employee benefit, compensation, worker classification, contracting, data privacy and security, Federal Sentencing Guideline and other governance and internal control and other rules specifically relating to workforce management, as well as industry and business specific internal controls and other performance management required to manage regulatory, contractual and operational compliance and risk management. Her experience includes decades of involvement advising and representing employers, educational organizations, health care organizations, and other businesses on Civil Rights Act and other federal, state and local discrimination laws.

Author of a thousands of highly regarded publications on HIPAA and other medical record and data privacy and scribe for the ABA JCEB Annual Meeting with the HHS Office of Civil Rights, her experience includes extensive involvement throughout her career in advising health care and life sciences and other clients about preventing, investigating and defending EEOC, DOJ, OFCCP and other Civil Rights Act, Section 1557 and other HHS, HUD, banking, and other federal and state discrimination investigations, audits, lawsuits and other enforcement actions as well as advocacy before Congress and regulators regarding federal and state equal opportunity, equity and other laws. 

For more information about Ms. Stamer, her legal, business and governmental relations consulting, training, public speaking or other services, experience and involvements , see www.cynthiastamer.com or contact Ms. Stamer via telephone at (214) 452-8297 or via e-mail here. 

About Solutions Laws Press, Inc.™

Solutions Law Press, Inc.™ provides human resources and employee benefit and other business risk management, legal compliance, management effectiveness and other coaching, tools and other resources, training and education on leadership, governance, human resources, employee benefits, data security and privacy, insurance, health care and other key compliance, risk management, internal controls and operational concerns. If you find this of interest, you also be interested in reviewing some of our other Solutions Law Press, Inc.™ resources available here, such as:

IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT THIS COMMUNICATION

If you or someone else you know would like to receive future updates about developments on these and other concerns, please be sure that we have your current contact information including your preferred e-mail by creating your profile here.

NOTICE: These statements and materials are for general informational and educational purposes only. They do not establish an attorney-client relationship, are not legal advice or an offer or commitment to provide legal advice, and do not serve as a substitute for legal advice. Readers are urged to engage competent legal counsel for consultation and representation in light of the specific facts and circumstances presented in their unique circumstances at any particular time. No comment or statement in this publication is to be construed as legal advice or an admission. The author and Solutions Law Press, Inc.™ reserve the right to qualify or retract any of these statements at any time. Likewise, the content is not tailored to any particular situation and does not necessarily address all relevant issues. Because the law is rapidly evolving and rapidly evolving rules make it highly likely that subsequent developments could impact the currency and completeness of this discussion. The author and Solutions Law Press, Inc.™ disclaim, and have no responsibility to provide any update or otherwise notify anyone of any such change, limitation, or other condition that might affect the suitability of reliance upon these materials or information otherwise conveyed in connection with this program. Readers may not rely upon, are solely responsible for, and assume the risk and all liabilities resulting from their use of this publication. Readers acknowledge and agree to the conditions of this Notice as a condition of their access to this publication. 

Circular 230 Compliance. The following disclaimer is included to ensure that we comply with U.S. Treasury Department Regulations. Any statements contained herein are not intended or written by the writer to be used, and nothing contained herein can be used by you or any other person, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties that may be imposed under federal tax law, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related transaction or matter addressed herein.

©2024 Cynthia Marcotte Stamer. Limited non-exclusive right to republish granted to Solutions Law Press, Inc.™

Comments Off on Prepare Defenses Against Rising Religious Discrimination Exposures | Corporate Compliance, Discrimination, EEOC, EEOC, Employers, religious accommodation, Religious Organization, Religous Discrimination | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer