The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) on June 30, 2026 voted to rescind two long-standing agency policy documents that for nearly 40 years shaped how employers structured voluntary workplace affirmative action efforts under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Commission withdrew its 1979 interpretive guidelines, Affirmative Action Appropriate Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as Amended, codified at 29 C.F.R. Part 1608, along with the related Compliance Manual Section 607 on Affirmative Action. See EEOC, “EEOC Votes to Rescind Affirmative Action Interpretive Guidelines and Related Compliance Manual” (June 30, 2026).

What the EEOC Did

The Commission determined that the 1979 Affirmative Action Guidelines conflict with the text of Title VII and with Supreme Court case law developed over the four decades since they were issued. EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas stated that the rescission is consistent with the text of Title VII and with Supreme Court precedent, and that the Commission’s action reaffirms that Title VII’s protections apply equally to every American worker. EEOC Press Release.

The Commission also voted to rescind the related Compliance Manual Section 607, finding it obsolete in light of the guideline rescission and inconsistent with intervening Supreme Court and lower court authority. Id.

What the Old Guidelines Did

The now-withdrawn Part 1608 Guidelines described the circumstances under which the Commission would treat voluntary, race-, sex-, or national-origin-conscious affirmative action as permissible under Title VII — including where an employer’s self-analysis identified an actual or potential adverse impact, the continuing effects of prior discriminatory practices, or an artificially limited applicant or promotion pool. A compliant plan under the Guidelines required three elements: a reasonable self-analysis, a reasonable basis for concluding action was appropriate, and reasonable, narrowly tailored action tied to the problem identified. See 29 C.F.R. § 1608.3 and 29 C.F.R. § 1608.4.

Critically, the Guidelines also functioned as a safe harbor. Section 713(b)(1) of Title VII, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-12(b)(1), allows a respondent to defend against a Title VII claim by showing it acted in good faith, in conformity with, and in reliance upon a written interpretation or opinion of the Commission. The Part 1608 Guidelines were themselves the Commission’s designated written interpretation for this purpose. See 29 C.F.R. § 1608.1 and 29 C.F.R. § 1608.9. With the Guidelines rescinded, that good-faith reliance defense is no longer available on a going-forward basis for affirmative action plans adopted or maintained after the rescission.

Court & Executive Orders Behind Policy Change

The rescission follows Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025), which directed federal agencies to terminate discriminatory and illegal preferences, mandates, policies, guidance, and enforcement positions, and to enforce longstanding civil rights laws against illegal private-sector DEI preferences and mandates. Id.

The rescission does not amend the text of Title VII itself. Title VII continues to prohibit discrimination in hiring, discharge, compensation, and other terms and conditions of employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq..

Employer Takeaways

Employers should treat this rescission as a signal of heightened EEOC scrutiny of race-, sex-, and national-origin-conscious employment practices, not as a wholesale prohibition on diversity or equal opportunity efforts. Stakeholder-specific action items follow.

C-Suite, Boards & Talent Leadership

C-suite, board and talent leaders should:

• Expect continued federal scrutiny of DEI-labeled programs and align messaging, policy documents, and public disclosures with a merit-based, individualized-decision-making framework.

• Budget for a documented, privileged legal review cycle for affirmative action, DEI, and representation-focused programs rather than a one-time policy edit.

• Monitor for parallel developments, including EEOC action affecting EEO-1 reporting and recordkeeping obligations, which may further change the compliance landscape.

In-House Counsel

In-house counsel should:

• Reassess litigation and charge-response strategy for any pending or anticipated EEOC matter that previously anticipated reliance on the Part 1608 Guidelines or the Section 713(b)(1) defense.

• Confirm that any voluntary affirmative action plan retained going forward is independently defensible under Title VII’s text and controlling case law, rather than under agency guidance that no longer exists.

• Coordinate review of affected plans under attorney-client privilege and work product protections given the increased risk of EEOC inquiry, private litigation, and reverse-discrimination claims.

Human Resources & Compliance Teams

Human resources and compliance teams should:

• Inventory all existing affirmative action plans, DEI hiring/promotion goals, mentoring, internship, fellowship, or pipeline programs that reference race, sex, or national origin as a factor in opportunity or selection.

• Flag any program that was adopted or documented as relying on the now-rescinded Part 1608 Guidelines or the Section 713(b)(1) good-faith defense for immediate legal review.

• Distinguish programs that merely expand outreach or applicant pools without using a protected characteristic as a selection factor from those that reserve slots, apply preferences, or set numeric targets tied to protected traits.

Cautionary Reminder: Protect Privilege

Employers reviewing existing affirmative action, DEI, or representation-focused programs in response to this rescission are strongly encouraged to conduct that review under attorney-client privilege and attorney work product protections, and to route related communications and self-analyses through counsel accordingly.

For Help or More Information

The author of this update, Cynthia Marcotte Stamer is an attorney Board Certified in Labor and Employment Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization with decades of experience advising and assisting health industry and other employers to design, audit, and defend their employment and other risk management and compliance practices, including conducting audits and investigations, designing and updating compliance and risk management programs, responding to government investigations, conducting transaction, governance, and other due diligence, and assisting with other legal and operational compliance and risk management and legislative and regulatory affairs. She is available to assist your organization in assessing the impact of these developments and navigating the compliance and strategic steps that follow. For more information about these concerns or Ms. Stamer, contact Ms. Stamer via e-mail or via telephone at (214) 452 -8297.

About the Author

Cynthia Marcotte Stamer is an American College of Employee Benefits Counsel and a Martindale-Hubble “AV-Preeminent” (Top 1%) attorney and advisor board certified in labor and employment law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization peer peer celebrated as “Top Rated Lawyer” and “LEGAL LEADER™ “Top Rated Lawyer” and “Best Lawyer” for her work in ERISA & Employee Benefits Law, Health Care Law, Labor and Employment Law, and Business and Commercial Law.

Nationally recognised for her decades of leading edge workforce, health and other employee benefits and insurance, compensation, regulatory affairs and compliance, and other human resources and other management work, public policy leadership and advocacy, coaching, teachings, and publications, Ms. Stamer’s work throughout her career has focused heavily on working with health care and managed care, health and other employee benefit plan, insurance and financial services and other public and private highly regulated and performance dependent organizations and their technology, data, and other service providers and advisors domestically and internationally with legal and operational compliance and risk management, performance and workforce management, regulatory and public policy and other legal and operational concerns.  As a a key focus of this work, she has continuously and extensively worked with domestic and international health plans, their sponsors, fiduciaries, administrators, and insurers; managed care and insurance organizations on workforce and performance management, employee benefits, compensation, regulatory and operational compliance, and other related concerns.

Her experience includes more than 35 years of leading edge work experience helping health care systems and organizations, group and individual health care providers, government contractors and other performance dependent employers; health plans and insurers, and a broad range of other businesses design and administer workforce, compensation and benefits, compliance and risk management and other practices and policies, and operate and defend organizations and practices to prevent, investigate, manage and resolve performance and behavior; manage civil rights, discrimination and accommodation, and other regulatory, contractual and other compliance responsibilities and risks; vendors and suppliers; conducting and defending investigations, audits, investigations, and other actions; crisis preparedness and response; to establish, administer and defend workforce and staffing, quality, and other compliance, risk management and operational practices, policies and actions; comply with requirements; investigate and respond to Department of Insurance, Board of Medicine, Health, Nursing, Pharmacy, Chiropractic, trucking, alcohol and firearm, and other licensing agencies, Department of Aging & Disability, FDA, Drug Enforcement Agency, OCR Privacy and Civil Rights, Department of Labor, IRS, HHS, DOD, FTC, SEC, CDC and other public health, Department of Justice and state attorneys’ general and other federal and state agencies; JCHO and other accreditation and quality organizations; private litigation and other federal and state health care industry actions: regulatory and public policy advocacy; training and discipline; enforcement;  and other strategic and operational concerns.

Former lead advisor to the Government of Bolivia on its Social Security Privatization reform, Ms. Stamer also has extensive international, federal and state legislative and regulatory affairs experience on federal, state and international workforce, employee benefits, healthcare, education, insurance, data privacy and security, antitrust, and other regulations and reforms.

In addition, Ms. Stamer also is widely celebrated for her leadership in the American Bar Association (“ABA”) and a multitude of other policy, professional, civic, educational, community and other organizations. Ms. Stamer currently or previously served as the the American Bar Association (“ABA”) Joint Committee on Employee Benefits (“JCEB”) leadership council, Scribe leading the Department of Health and Human Services annual agency meeting and a representative to other annual agency meetings, speaker, author and faculty; the ABA International Section International Employment Law Committee and International Life Sciences Committee Chair; the ABA Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section Medicine and Law Committee Chair, SCOPE member, and Employee Benefits and Worker’s Compensation Committees Vice Chair; the ABA Health Law Section Managed Care & Insurance Interest Group Chair and Risk Management Interest Group Vice Chair; the ABA RPTE Employee Benefits & Other Compensation Group Chair and Welfare Benefit, Fiduciary Responsibility, and Plan Terminations and Transactions Committees Chair; the North Texas Health Care Compliance Professionals Association Vice President and Executive Director; a Southwest Benefits Association Board Member, Treasurer and Continuing Education Committee Chair; a SHRM Consultants National and Region IV Board Chair; a WEB National Board Member and Dallas Chapter President; the National Kidney Foundation of North Texas Board Member and Compliance Chair; the Richardson Development Center (now Warren Center) for Children Early Childhood Intervention Agency Board President; a North Texas United Way Long Range Planning Committee Member; and in many other leadership roles in a broad range of other professional and civic organizations.

Along with these activities, Ms. Stamer also has earned national recognition for her authorship of thousands of highly regarded works, presentations as a knowledgeable speaker, testimony and other input of regulators and legislators, and media interviews on health and other benefits, human resources and other workforce, health care, insurance, data privacy and security and other related concerns. 

For more information about Ms. Stamer or her health industry and other experience and involvements, see www.cynthiastamer.com or contact Ms. Stamer via telephone at (214) 452-8297 or via e-mail here.