Today (March 2, 2020) is the deadline for employers and other health benefit program sponsors, insurers, plan administrators and fiduciaries, health care providers, PBMs and other interested persons to comment on proposed federal rule change that would require insured health plans to count drug rebates and price concessions retained by pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) as administrative expenses for purposes of determining if the issuing insurer is required to rebate premiums under the medical loss ratio (MLR) rules of the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act (“ACA”). With the comment period on the package of health care transparency regulations published by the Trump Administration to implement the transparency reform it hopes will fuel better quality and cost effectiveness in the U.S. health care system, health plan sponsors, fiduciaries, administrators, insurers, heath care providers, PBMs, and other participants in the system need to start preparing to deal with their own responsibilities under the new rules, and to help plan members, patients and their caregivers, and other consumers to understand and use the new information the rules will make available.
2/06/20 Proposed Rule Pressures Insurers To Require PBMs To Disclose & Pass Through Manufacturer Rebates
Issued as part of the proposed “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2021; Notice Requirement for Non-Federal Governmental Plans Proposed Rule” (“2/6/20 Proposed Rule”) published by the Department of Health & Human Services (“HHS”) on February 6. 2020, the as part of a series of Trump Administration health care reform initiatives seeking to use competition and transparency to improve health care quality, choice and affordability, in furtherance of the Trump Administration “health plan transparency” initiative HHS predicts this change included in the could generate $18.2 million more per year in the MLR rebate payments to consumers covered under insure health plans subject to the MLR and other insurance market reform provisions of the ACA. See also Remarks by President Trump on Honesty and Transparency in Healthcare Prices (November 15, 2019). For a more detailed summary of the 2/06/20 Proposed Rule, see here.Most health plans contract with PBMs to decide the prescription drug formularies, copays, and other coverage design for their health plans, to administer their pharmacy benefits and to negotiate discounts and rebates from drug manufacturers in exchange for placing their drugs on a health plan’s formulary. PBMs are supposed to work on behalf of health plans to secure drug rebates, refunds, discounts, coupons, and direct or indirect remuneration, among other discounts. Health plans compensate PBMs in a variety of ways, including:
- Paying administrative fees;
- Allowing a PBM to retain the difference between the amount a PBM charges the health plan for a drug and the amount a PBM pays the pharmacy (called “spread pricing”); or
- Allowing a PBM to retain all or a portion of any negotiated discounts from manufacturers, including rebates.
Currently, insured plans covered by the MLR rule as well as the PBM arrangements of many self-insured, employer or union sponsored health plans, do not require PBMs to disclose, account for, or pass through to the health plan they are engaged by the prescription drug rebates and certain other amounts that PBMs receive and retain from prescription drug manufacturers that the PBM selects for inclusion on the health plan formulary.
The current federal ACA MLR rule requires insured health plans subject to the MLR rule to deduct from their prescription drug claims both rebates they receive from manufacturers and any payments the PBM retains from the spread, but does not address situations in which the PBM retains rebates or other price concessions negotiated on behalf of the plans. Consequently, the MLR reporting or calculation of insurers typically does not reflect any rebates PBMs retain that are not passed through to the insurer even though the PBM is supposed to be working on behalf of the health plan.
In recent years, these arrangements have come under widespread criticism as creating conflicts of interests that compromise the loyalty of the PBM to act in the best interest of its health plan clients and their plan members because when PBMs don’t report and pass through all pricing concessions negotiated by PBMs, health plans and health plan members don’t receive the benefit of those price discounts and the decisions that the PBM makes in choosing the highest quality and most cost effective medications for the formulary may lead the PBM to choose and price drugs on the plan formulary to maximize the PBM’s profits rather than the best interests of the plan and its members.
The 2/06/20 Proposed Rule would classify the portion of premium revenue that an insured health plan subject to the MLR rule expends on pharmacy costs as the actual reimbursement to pharmacies – minus any rebates or price concessions from manufacturers – no matter if the plan or its contracted PBM receives the price concession. Requiring health insurers covered by the MLR rule to include rebates retained by their PBMs an administrative expense would make it difficult for most health insurers to keep all administrative expenses within 15 or 20 percent the MLR rules. Since health insurers whose administrative expenses exceed the MLS ratio must rebate premiums under the ACA, HHS anticipates that finalizing the 2/06/20 Proposed Rule as proposed would prompt insured health plans covered by the MLR rule that use PBMs to administer pharmacy benefits to change the compensation provisions of their PBM contracts to eliminate or restructure those payments.
Since self-insured health plans generally are not subject to the ACA MLR rule, however, those plans generally need to pursue contracting or other strategies to address this concern. Increasingly, many self-insured health plan sponsors, fiduciaries and administrators already are changing their PBM contracting and selection strategies to require disclosure and pass through of rebate and other compensation received by PBMs from manufacturers such as including administrative-fee-only compensation and a guarantee of 100 percent pass-through of rebates and manufacturer-derived revenue from the PBM to the health plan in their PBM contracts.
With the official comment deadline set to expire on March 2, 2020, employer and other insured and self-insured health plan sponsors of health plans using PBMs, fiduciaries and advisors should turn their attention to evaluating the likely implications of the 02/06/20 Proposed Rule on their health plan arrangements as well as more generally evaluating their pharmacy benefit designs, PBM contracts and compensation arrangements, and associated arrangements and practices for potential conflicts of interest, hidden cost savings and other opportunities for improvement. As part of this efforts, employer sponsors, plan fiduciaries, administrators, and vendors of self-insured plans should keep in mind that the fiduciary responsibility rules of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act generally require plan fiduciaries to prudently evaluate compensation and other arrangements with plan vendors as well as to take action to identify and protect the plan against breaches of loyalty by plan vendors or fiduciaries from conflicts of interests or prohibited transactions. Plan administrators also should conduct due diligence to confirm that PBM and other vendors properly including all compensation for purposes of Form 5500 and other reporting. Along with assisting their health plan clients with these activities, brokers, consultants, TPAs, and other plan vendors also should evaluate the potential implications of the reforms in the 02/06/20 Proposed Rule as well as any relevant state law reforms on the advice and services they provide to their clients, as well as their potential responsibilities and exposures in light of the evolving state health and PBM transparency rules.
Other Health Plan Transparency Reforms
The 2/06/20 Proposed Rule is one in a series of federal health rule changes the Trump Administration is pursuing as part of its initiative seeking to use health care transparency to improve the price, quality and choice in the U.S. health care system. In addition to the changes proposed in the 2/06/20 Proposed Rule, in response to President Trump’s July 24, 2020 Executive Order on Improving Price and Quality Transparency in American Healthcare to Put Patients First, HHS on November 14, 2019 also undertook two other regulatory actions intended to increase price transparency to empower patients and increase competition among all hospitals, group health plans and health insurance issuers in the individual and group markets:
- Issued a proposed Transparency in Coverage Proposed Rule (the “Proposed Coverage Transparency Rule”); and
- The Calendar Year (CY) 2020 Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) & Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) Price Transparency Requirements for Hospitals to Make Standard Charges Public Final Rule (“Hospital Transparency Rule”).
Both the final and proposed rules require that pricing information be made publicly available.
- Proposed Coverage Transparency Rule
The Proposed Coverage Transparency Rule would require most employer-based group health plans and health insurance issuers offering group and individual coverage to disclose price and cost-sharing information to participants, beneficiaries, and enrollees up front. With this information, patients will have accurate estimates of any out-of-pocket costs they must pay to meet their plan’s deductible, co-pay, or co-insurance requirements. This will make previously unavailable price information accessible to patients and other stakeholders in a standardized way, allowing for easy comparisons.
If finalized, the Proposed Transparency in Coverage Rule will require non-grandfathered health plans and health insurance issuers to make certain health care price information more accessible to consumers and other stakeholders by requiring each non-grandfathered group health plan or health insurance issuer offering non-grandfathered health insurance coverage in the individual and group markets to make available:
- To participants, beneficiaries and enrollees (or their authorized representative) personalized out-of-pocket cost information for all covered health care items and services through an internet-based self-service tool and in paper form upon request. For the first time, most consumers would be able to get estimates of their cost-sharing liability for health care for different providers, allowing them to both understand how costs for covered health care items and services are determined by their plan, and shop and compare costs for health care before receiving care; and
- To the public, including stakeholders such as consumers, researchers, employers, and third-party developers the in-network negotiated rates with their network providers and historical payments of allowed amounts to out-of-network providers through standardized, regularly updated machine-readable files.
The Trump Administration believes these changes will provide opportunities for innovation to drive price comparison and consumerism in the health care market. In addition, the Transparency In Coverage Rule also proposes to allow issuers that empower and incentivize consumers through the introduction of plans that include provisions that encourage consumers to shop for services from lower-cost, higher-value providers, and that share the resulting savings with consumers, to take credit for such “shared savings” payments in their medical loss ratio (MLR) calculations. HHS says it made this proposal to ensure, should the proposal be finalized as proposed, that issuers would not be required to pay MLR rebates based on a plan design that would provide a benefit to consumers that is not currently captured in any existing MLR revenue or expense category. HHS believes this proposal would preserve the statutorily-required value that consumers receive for coverage under the MLR program, while encouraging issuers to offer new or different value-based plan designs that support competition and consumer engagement in health care. See also Transparency in Coverage Proposed Rule (CMS-9915-P) Fact Sheet. The official comment period on the Proposed Transparency in Coverage Rule has not expired. In January, HHS extended the comment period on the Transparency in Coverage Rule from January 14, 2020 to January 29, 2020.
- Final Hospital Transparency Rule
Concurrent with its release of the Proposed Coverage Transparency Rule, HHS also finalized the Hospital Transparency Rule that will require hospitals to provide patients with clear, accessible information about their “standard charges” for the items and services they provide in two ways beginning in 2021:
- Comprehensive Machine-Readable File: Hospitals will be required to make public all hospital standard charges (including the gross charges, payer-specific negotiated charges, the amount the hospital is willing to accept in cash from a patient, and the minimum and maximum negotiated charges) for all items and services on the Internet in a single data file that can be read by other computer systems. The file must include additional information such as common billing or accounting codes used by the hospital (such as Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes) and a description of the item or service to provide common elements for consumers to compare standard charges from hospital to hospital.
- Display of Shoppable Services in a Consumer-Friendly Manner: Hospitals will be required to make public payer-specific negotiated charges, the amount the hospital is willing to accept in cash from a patient for an item or service, and the minimum and maximum negotiated charges for 300 common shoppable services in a manner that is consumer-friendly and update the information at least annually.
- Shoppable services are services that can be scheduled by a healthcare consumer in advance such as x-rays, outpatient visits, imaging and laboratory tests or bundled services like a cesarean delivery, including pre- and post-delivery care.
- The requirements for the consumer-friendly file are that the information must be made public in a prominent location online that is easily accessible, without barriers, and it must also be searchable. Item and service descriptions must be in ‘plain language’ and the shoppable service charges must be displayed and grouped with charges for any ancillary services the hospital customarily provides with the primary shoppable service.
In order to ensure that hospitals comply with the requirements, the Hospital Transparency Rule also provides CMS with new enforcement tools including monitoring, auditing, corrective action plans, and the ability to impose civil monetary penalties of $300 per day. In response to public comments, CMS is finalizing that the effective date of the final rule will be January 1, 2021 to ensure that hospitals have the time to be compliant with these policies. See also
Calendar Year (CY) 2020 Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) & Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) Price Transparency Requirements for Hospitals to Make Standard Charges Public final rule (CMS-1717-F2) Fact Sheet.
Start Preparing For New Transparency Requirements, Effects & Opportunities
With the comment periods on the Proposed Transparency in Coverage Rule already past and the deadline for comment on the 2/6/20 Proposed Rule set to expire today, employer and other health benefit plan sponsors, insurers, fiduciaries, administrators, heath care providers, insurers, plan members and other stakeholders should turn their attention to evaluating the potential opportunities, burdens, and impacts of these transparency reforms.
We hope this update is helpful. For more information about the or other health or other employee benefits, human resources, or health care developments, please contact the author Cynthia Marcotte Stamer via e-mail or via telephone at (214) 452 -8297.
Solutions Law Press, Inc. invites you receive future updates by registering on our Solutions Law Press, Inc. Website and participating and contributing to the discussions in our Solutions Law Press, Inc. LinkedIn SLP Health Care Risk Management & Operations Group, HR & Benefits Update Compliance Group, and/or Coalition for Responsible Health Care Policy.
About the Author
The author of this update, Cynthia Marcotte Stamer, will speak about these and other health care cost and transparency reforms as a panelist on the program on Impact of Governmental Policy on Pricing and Access to Prescription Medical Products in the US and International Marketplace scheduled to take place at the American Bar Association International Section Annual Meeting in New York City on April 23, 2020.
Recognized by her peers as a Martindale-Hubble “AV-Preeminent” (Top 1%) and “Top Rated Lawyer” with special recognition LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell® as “LEGAL LEADER™ Texas Top Rated Lawyer” in Health Care Law and Labor and Employment Law; as among the “Best Lawyers In Dallas” for her work in the fields of “Labor & Employment,” “Tax: ERISA & Employee Benefits,” “Health Care” and “Business and Commercial Law” by D Magazine, Cynthia Marcotte Stamer is a practicing attorney board certified in labor and employment law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and management consultant, author, public policy advocate and lecturer widely known for 30+ years of health industry and other management work, public policy leadership and advocacy, coaching, teachings, and publications including more than 30 years’ leading edge work on PBM and other insured and self-insured contracting and related matters. .
Author of numerous highly regarded works on PBM and other health plan contracting and design, Vice Chair of the ABA International Section Life Sciences Committee, past Chair of the ABA Health Law Section Managed Care & Insurance Interest Group and the ABA RPTE Employee Benefits & Other Compensation Group, Ms. Stamer’s work throughout her 30 plus year career has focused heavily on working with health care and managed care, health and other employee benefit plan, insurance and financial services and other public and private organizations and their technology, data, and other service providers and advisors domestically and internationally with legal and operational compliance and risk management, performance and workforce management, regulatory and public policy and other legal and operational concerns. As a part of this work, she has continuously and extensively worked with domestic and international health plans, their sponsors, fiduciaries, administrators, and insurers; managed care and insurance organizations; hospitals, health care systems and other health care providers, accreditation, peer review and quality committees and organizations; billing, utilization management, management services organizations, group purchasing organizations; pharmaceutical, pharmacy, and prescription benefit management and organizations; consultants; investors; EMR, claims, payroll and other technology, billing and reimbursement and other services and product vendors; products and solutions consultants and developers; investors; managed care organizations, self-insured health and other employee benefit plans, their sponsors, fiduciaries, administrators and service providers, insurers and other payers, health industry advocacy and other service providers and groups and other health and managed care industry clients as well as federal and state legislative, regulatory, investigatory and enforcement bodies and agencies.
Ms. Stamer is most widely recognized for her decades of pragmatic, leading edge work, scholarship and thought leadership on health and other privacy and data security and other health industry legal, public policy and operational concerns. This involvement encompasses helping health care systems and organizations, group and individual health care providers, health plans and insurers, health IT, life sciences and other health industry clients prevent, investigate, manage and resolve sexual assault, abuse, harassment and other organizational, provider and employee misconduct and other performance and behavior; manage Section 1557, Civil Rights Act and other discrimination and accommodation, and other regulatory, contractual and other compliance; vendors and suppliers; contracting and other terms of participation, medical billing, reimbursement, claims administration and coordination, Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, Medicare/Medicaid Advantage, ERISA and other payers and other provider-payer relations, contracting, compliance and enforcement; Form 990 and other nonprofit and tax-exemption; fundraising, investors, joint venture, and other business partners; quality and other performance measurement, management, discipline and reporting; physician and other workforce recruiting, performance management, peer review and other investigations and discipline, wage and hour, payroll, gain-sharing and other pay-for performance and other compensation, training, outsourcing and other human resources and workforce matters; board, medical staff and other governance; strategic planning, process and quality improvement; meaningful use, EMR, HIPAA and other technology, data security and breach and other health IT and data; STARK, ant kickback, insurance, and other fraud prevention, investigation, defense and enforcement; audits, investigations, and enforcement actions; trade secrets and other intellectual property; crisis preparedness and response; internal, government and third-party licensure, credentialing, accreditation, HCQIA and other peer review and quality reporting, audits, investigations, enforcement and defense; patient relations and care; internal controls and regulatory compliance; payer-provider, provider-provider, vendor, patient, governmental and community relations; facilities, practice, products and other sales, mergers, acquisitions and other business and commercial transactions; government procurement and contracting; grants; tax-exemption and not-for-profit; privacy and data security; training; risk and change management; regulatory affairs and public policy; process, product and service improvement, development and innovation, and other legal and operational compliance and risk management, government and regulatory affairs and operations concerns. to establish, administer and defend workforce and staffing, quality, and other compliance, risk management and operational practices, policies and actions; comply with requirements; investigate and respond to Board of Medicine, Health, Nursing, Pharmacy, Chiropractic, and other licensing agencies, Department of Aging & Disability, FDA, Drug Enforcement Agency, OCR Privacy and Civil Rights, Department of Labor, IRS, HHS, DOD, FTC, SEC, CDC and other public health, Department of Justice and state attorneys’ general and other federal and state agencies; JCHO and other accreditation and quality organizations; private litigation and other federal and state health care industry actions: regulatory and public policy advocacy; training and discipline; enforcement; and other strategic and operational concerns.
Author of publications on “Transparent PBM Contracting,” “ACOs, Direct Contracting: Legal & Practical Challenges For Employers, Providers & TPAs,” “The Medicare Advantage Contracting Manual,” “Third Party Administrator (TPA) Contracting Principles and Strategies and a multitude of other highly regarded publications and presentations, Stamer is widely recognized for her thought leadership on PBM and other managed care and health plan contracting and design, and a multitude of other health care, health plan and other health industry matters. In addition, Ms. Stamer contributes her time and leadership to numerous policy, professional, civil and other organizations including service as the, the American Bar Association (ABA) International Section Life Sciences Committee Vice Chair, a Scribe for the ABA Joint Committee on Employee Benefits (JCEB) Annual OCR Agency Meeting and a former Council Representative, Past Chair of the ABA Managed Care & Insurance Interest Group, former Vice President and Executive Director of the North Texas Health Care Compliance Professionals Association, past Board President of Richardson Development Center (now Warren Center) for Children Early Childhood Intervention Agency, past North Texas United Way Long Range Planning Committee Member, and past Board Member and Compliance Chair of the National Kidney Foundation of North Texas, and a Fellow in the American College of Employee Benefit Counsel, the American Bar Foundation and the Texas Bar Foundation, Ms. Stamer also shares her extensive publications and thought leadership as well as leadership involvement in a broad range of other professional and civic organizations. For more information about Ms. Stamer or her health industry and other experience and involvements, see www.cynthiastamer.com or contact Ms. Stamer via telephone at (214) 452-8297 or via e-mail here.
About Solutions Law Press, Inc.™
Solutions Law Press, Inc.™ provides human resources and employee benefit and other business risk management, legal compliance, management effectiveness and other coaching, tools and other resources, training and education on leadership, governance, human resources, employee benefits, data security and privacy, insurance, health care and other key compliance, risk management, internal controls and operational concerns. If you find this of interest, you also be interested reviewing some of our other Solutions Law Press, Inc.™ resources available here such as:
- 2/28 New Comment Deadline For NLRB Proposal To Exclude College Work Study Student Workers From NLRA Coverage
- Don’t Get Stuck Paying Another Employer’s Overtime Or Other Backpay
- 2019 OCR Enforcement Shows Getting Defensibly HIPAA Compliant Necessary In 2020!
- DOJ Omnicare/CVS Suit Highlights Potential Pharmacy Benefit Claims Abuse Exposure For Health Plans, Member Safety Risk
- OSHA Seeks Small Business Volunteers For Tree Care Safety Panel
- NLRB Restores Pre-Obama Era Union Dues Checkoff Rule
- $1.6M HIPAA Penalty Largely Caused By Inadequate Security Assessments & Oversight
- 10 Former NFL Payers Charged With Defrauding NFL Retiree Health Fund
- NLRB Order Directs Settlement Of McDonald’s Unfair Labor Practice Complaints Including Joint Employer Liability Charges Against McDonald’s USA
- 2018 US National Health Expenditures Grew Again
- ONC Patient Matching for Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Slides Available
- SBA Hosts Employee Benefits Roundtable 11/21
- College Pays $54,000 To Settle DOJ ADA Lawsuit For Paramedic Program’s Termination of TA With MS
- Business Leaders Serve Jail Time For Employment Tax Crimes
- New $2.15M OCR Penalty Shows Health Plans Risks Of HIPAA Violations
- Proposed NLRB Employee Definition To Exclude College Study Workers
- DOL Proposing To Allow Default Website ERISA Retirement Plan Disclosures
If you or someone else you know would like to receive future updates about developments on these and other concerns, please be sure that we have your current contact information including your preferred e-mail by creating your profile here.
NOTICE: These statements and materials are for general informational and purposes only. They do not establish an attorney-client relationship, are not legal advice or an offer or commitment to provide legal advice, and do not serve as a substitute for legal advice. Readers are urged to engage competent legal counsel for consultation and representation considering the specific facts and circumstances presented in their unique circumstance at the particular time. No comment or statement in this publication is to be construed as legal advice or an admission. The author reserves the right to qualify or retract any of these statements at any time. Likewise, the content is not tailored to any particular situation and does not necessarily address all relevant issues. Because the law constantly and often rapidly evolves, subsequent developments that could impact the currency and completeness of this discussion are likely. The author and Solutions Law Press, Inc. disclaim, and have no responsibility to provide any update or otherwise notify anyone of any fact or law specific nuance, change, limitation, or other condition that might affect the suitability of reliance upon these materials or information otherwise conveyed in connection with this program. Readers may not rely upon, are solely responsible for, and assume the risk and all liabilities resulting from their use of this publication.
Circular 230 Compliance. The following disclaimer is included to ensure that we comply with U.S. Treasury Department Regulations. Any statements contained herein are not intended or written by the writer to be used, and nothing contained herein can be used by you or any other person, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties that may be imposed under federal tax law, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related transaction or matter addressed herein.
©2020 Cynthia Marcotte Stamer. Non-exclusive right to republish granted to Solutions Law Press, Inc.™ For information about republication, please contact the author directly. All other rights reserved.