<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://slphrbenefitsupdate.com/2026/06/03/group-health-plans-face-added-duties-tighter-requirements-under-newly-finalized-federal-no-surprises-act-idr-operations-rule/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name></news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-06-03T07:54:59+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Group Health Plans Face Added Duties, Tighter Requirements Under Newly Finalized Federal No Surprises Act IDR Operations RuleEven As Many Plans Face Added Costs and Liabilities For Bungled Handling of Existing Duties</news:title></news:news></url><url><loc>https://slphrbenefitsupdate.com/2026/06/02/supreme-court-leaves-ninth-circuit-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-ruling-in-place-what-curtis-v-inslee-means-for-employers/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name></news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-06-02T19:19:20+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Supreme Court Leaves Ninth Circuit COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Ruling in Place: What Curtis v. Inslee Means for Employers</news:title><news:keywords>Vaccine vaccination employer ada civil rights 1983</news:keywords></news:news></url></urlset>
